Victorina Hall of Justice

Curacha to Victorina, Making Sense of Our Senators

2009-06-11T23:46:00.001-07:00

by: Andro Ramirez

For once, I am at a loss on how to start writing an article without making it look like a PR job- A thing Belo and Solis love doing. I have even asked the Council explicitly to give this assignment to someone else since it would be very difficult for me to remain objective because the subject is a person I admire tremendously. But no, they did not budge. With no option left, I declare; “I love Osang.”

Borne Jennifer Adriano, this icon is more popularly known as Rosanna “Osang” Roces. From her character's very inception, “Osang” has been known for being outspoken, straightforward, and most of the time brutally candid. She never cultivated a sweet image like her sexy-starlet contemporaries, and even admitted her past indiscretions without fear. The first to bravely admit on air that she has gone under the knife, to enhance her already beautiful looks as Ana Maceda, in a time when such cosmetic procedures is taboo to be admitted on air.

Therefore, I don’t understand why a Lolit Solis would describe her as “mukhang unggoy” before her surgery. Incidentally, the name Ana Maceda was derived from Annabelle Rama and Ernesto Maceda. Still fresh in the showbiz scene during the 90’s and needing a media boost, she named names on national TV regarding the “Bruneiyuki’s” which implicated Ruffa Gutierrez among others. An issue, which later on caught the attention of the SENATE and was investigated. And like all Senate investigations, NOTHING CAME OUT OF IT. Sounds familiar?

Osang, an avid supporter of Victorina, has been in the news again lately when she was sought for her reaction to Vicky Belo being implicated in the Hayden Cam Scandal. Without batting an eyelash, she said, “I think karma has taken its toll on her and it will not stop.” It is fact that Osang used to be an endorser of Belo; they even became partners when they put up “Forever Flawless.” The two had a falling out that led to cases being filed in court, which is still pending as of this writing. A libel case filed by Belo against Osang was dismissed in 2007.

Asked further about Vicky Belo being implicated in the Hayden Kho – Katrina Halili scandal, she says she has no sympathy towards the doctor, whom a while back, she addressed as nothing but a gym instructor. She continues by saying she thanks God that she never got implicated in that kind of a scandal in her life. She adds that she may be ready to forgive (Belo), but sure of herself that she can never forget whatever ills that transpired between her and Belo.

What goes around, comes around... or so the saying goes. According to one media practitioner who wishes to remain unnamed, “Instead of spending frivolously on debauched soirées and lavish parties to further the unnecessary grandness of the Belo brand... Oh and don't forget about the different trips to far-flung cities around the world which she doles out to her media friends... The last time I heard corrupting the values of media men is ghastly. Belo should focus on herself and the people around her. It's like she's living in some fantasy world of her own creation, oblivious to the evils and negativities of the real world.”

Belo and Solis and their devious ways will be forgotten soon but who would forget Osang?

Who could ever forget the 1998 Star awards wherein she came with one of her breasts exposed painted over with body paint... Her nun costume with see through satin back... Her numerous warnings given by the MTRCB. In response, she attended a TV show wearing a black t-shirt with the words “Down With Hypocrisy.” And who woud forget the Rico Yan death controversy that never had an end to it. Her being censured by the KBP along with GMA Anchor Mike Enriquez, made her decide to withdraw its membership from the group.

The list goes on and on.

Rosanna Roces may well be the embodiment of Meredith Brook’s song “Bitch” but borrowing a line from the song and “enhancing” it a bit: “I know I wouldn’t want “Osang” any other way.”

Blogging Libel Test by Pangandaman

2009-04-04T01:08:00.000-07:00

President Gloria Arroyo with Presidential Chief of Staff Michael Defensor and Secretary Nasser Pangandaman

A Bad Case to Test Internet Libel or how not to fight a blogger

By: Rain B

This is supposedly a test-case against bloggers. The Philippine Star reports: “Paca-Ambung Macabando, provincial prosecutor of Lanao del Sur, issued his nine-page resolution dated March 12 elevating the libel charges against (Blogger Bambee) De la Paz before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) after she failed to submit her counter-affidavit before the deadline two days earlier. Macabando said a careful analysis of De la Paz’s blog titled “The World had Gone Crazy” reveals that there was an intention to “impute a discreditable act or condition.”

“It was a genuine plea of De la Paz to all persons that may have been reading her blog to support her in portraying Mayor (Nasser) Pangandaman and Secretary Pangandaman as cruel, incompetent government officials, without delicadeza and cannot lead to peace,” said Macabando. (italics mine)

I don’t know what “careful analysis” the provincial prosecutor did, but if he is looking for a test case for e-libel, this case should not be it.

Victorina legal adviser and managing editor can help me out with this, but as far as I know, that law states that in every criminal prosecution for libel, the truth may be given in evidence to the court and if it appears that the matter charged as libelous is true, and, moreover, that it was published with good motives and for justifiable ends, the defendants shall be acquitted.

What could be better motives than seeking redress and/or making public officials be subjected to the highest standards of decent behaviors?

The daughter just saw her father and her brother engage in a violent brawl. It is not clear now who actually instigated it, but the truth is that two politicians were involved. Bambee told her story, asked for prayers and begged for justice. The two politicians were public figures – one at present is an elected official, the other a Cabinet Secretary.

They are public figures, as such their behaviors should be subjected to scrutiny, how much more their involvement in a bloody fight, in the grounds of a posh golf club, during the holidays!

Bambee de la Paz used the best tool to put across her message for free– the blogworld. Nobody is stopping the two politicians to reply to her version of the story in the same platform. On one hand, I am bound to agree that the Pangandamans were tried in the court of public (online) opinion and were judged as guilty even without hearing their version of the story.

I was hoping that they, the Pangandamans, would have bombarded the internet with their own version and allow the internet community to make up its mind. Delfin Montano appeared in national television to refute Brian Gorrell. He gave us an opportunity to think twice about the case and to make up our minds.

Filing a case of libel would only result to at least any of these things:

a. It will aggravate the public sentiment that the Pangandamans are bullies, and this time they are using the courts to overpower a young lady blogger.

b. It will cement the case that the older Pangandaman cannot be an effective peace advocate as he can’t even negotiate peace with a single family, and would resort to the aid of the law to prove his point.

c. It will open a new round of anti-Pangandaman sentiment among bloggers. They might be able to threaten the Philippine-based ones, but the global bloggers can take that case to a wider arena.

d. Has the PROVINCIAL prosecutor ever thought of the principle of domain.

All of these risks for what?

Just to test a case of internet libel?

Good luck if he will win.

But this is certain – the Pangandamans will lose once more in the court of public opinion.

The submission of the case and the issuance of a resolution a mere TWO DAYS after Ms. de la Paz failed to submit her counter-affidavit is, by any standards, WRONG! If anyone noticed, Ms. de la Paz is Manila-based. The case was filed in Lanao del Sur. Normally, the prosecutors will give a respondent at least another opportunity to answer the charges, especially in a case as serious as this, which involves a prison term. There are loads of questions to answer now.

First, did Ms. de la Paz even receive a notice? It is, after all, some distance from Lanao del Sur to Manila. Was Ms. de la Paz given adequate opportunity to answer?

Clearly not, because the Resolution was completely done within TWO days from the last hearing. Quite a hard-working prosecutor we have here. Most prosecutors take full advantage of the ninety day period they have to resolve a case. This prosecutor doesnt seem to have any other cases.

Am I saying the prosecutor is on the take? No.

But certainly the entire proceedings seem out of the ordinary and seems to take undue advantage of the distance of Ms. de la Paz' residence to the venue of the proceedings.

Fast break, anyone?

Big mistake. Again!

Is Smith Innocent After All

2009-03-30T01:10:00.000-07:00

I am convinced. My name is not Nicole.

By Rain B.

Victorina originally planned to write an article dissecting the motivations of Nicole for recanting. We heard stories of the 100K cash gift to the family. We know of the feminist interpretation of this as part of the conspiracy by Malacanang. Yet, we also heard rumors that in fact she was a prostitute who saw a golden opportunity.

However, we decided not to tell you our story of Nicole. Instead, we will let Nicole tell her story. This is from her sworn testimony. We trust that our readers will share their points of view. We will also share ours.

What to make out of the story of Nicole?

Deep inside, however, I know that I may never be able to move on for as long as I continue to search for answers to so many questions that have lingered in my mind regarding the incident in Subic more that three years ago. Daniel Smith was convicted of rape because the court accepted my version that he took advantage of my intoxication i raping me inside a van that took us to the seawall located at the SBMA Alaba Pier at around 11:30 in the evening of November 1, 2005.

1. Daniel Smith's witnesses said that while we were at the Neptune Club, I sat on Daniel Smith's lap and that we kissed each other passionately. I remember that before I met Daniel Smith at the Neptune Club, all I ate was a slice of pizza at the Grand Leisure Hotel. After the pizza, everything else was alcohol drinks from vodka sprite, B52, Singaporean sling, B53, long island ice tea to bullfrog all of which I drank bottoms up. I do not recall Daniel Smith having ordered any alcoholic drink for me. My drinks were all paid for by Chris Mills who invited me to go to the Neptune Club.

2. I had no opportunity to deny in court that I kissed Daniel Smith but with the amount of alcoholic mixed drinks I took, my low tolerance level for alcohol and with only a slice of pizza all night, it dawned upon me that I may have possibly lost my inhibitions, became so intimate with Daniel Smith and did more than just dancing and talking with him like everyone else on the dance floor. Looking back, I would not have agreed to talk with Daniel Smith and dance with him no less than three times if I did not enjoy his company or was at least attracted to him since I met him for the very first time on the dance floor of Neptune Club.

3. When I danced with Daniel Smith for the third time, my companions, Chris Mills has already left Neptune Club since they had to catch their curfew time at the military base. The lighting was sufficient for people to recognize each other and other marines were with their Filipino partners drinking, dancing, and enjoying each other's company and kissing and hugging among partners was a common scene.

4. With the events at the Neptune Club in mind, I keep on asking myself, if Daniel Smith wanted to rape me, why would he carry me out of the Neptune Club using the main entrance in full view of the security guard and the other customers? Why would the van park right in front of Neptune Club? Why would Daniel Smith and his companies bring me to the seawall of Alaba pier and casually leave this area that was well lighted and with many people roaming around? If they believed that I was raped, would they have not dumped me instead in a dimly lit area along the highway going to Alaba pier to avoid detection?

5. I told the court that Daniel Smith kissed my lips and neck and held my breast inside the van. Recalling my testimony, I ask myself how I could have remembered this if witnesses told the court that I passed out and looked unconscious when I was brought to the van by Daniel Smith. How could I have resisted his advances given this condition? Daniel Smith and I were alone on the third row of the van which had limited space and I do not recall anyone inside the van who held my hand or any part of my body. What I can recall is that there was very loud music and shouting inside the van.

6. If the travel from Neptune Club took only several minutes and with the driver of the van trying to beat the curfew time of his passengers, how could I have instantly regained my consciousness and talked to the people upon reaching the seawall of Alaba Pier? When people gathered around me at the seawall, everyone seemed to have drawn the conclusion that I was raped except for one who called me a bitch.

7. Based on the account of the SBMA police, I was very hesitant to board the mobile police car that brought me to the headquarters for investigation. I was so confused and the first thing that entered my mind was how would my mother and boyfriend react if they learn that I was last seen with Daniel Smith and that a condom was seen on my pants after Daniel Smith left the van? I was scared of losing not only my American boyfriend but the chance of living in the United States. In fact, I did not immediately tell my boyfriend that I was raped by Daniel Smith. All I said was that something bad happened to me.

8. I expect many sectors to question my motives in executing this statement more than three years after the incident. However, as I practically grew up interacting with American servicemen in Zamboanga City who treated me and my family very well, and thinking over and over again how I may have conducted myself at the Neptune Club, I can't help but entertain doubts on whether the sequence of events in Subic last November of 2005 really occurred the way the court found them to have happened.

9. My conscience continues to bother me realizing that I may have in fact been so friendly and intimate with Daniel Smith at the Neptune Club that he was led to believe that I was amenable to having sex or that we simply just got carried away. I would rather risk public outrage than do nothing to help the court in ensuring that justice is served.

What say you?

Religious Ecstasy

2009-02-21T20:53:00.001-08:00

by Andro Ramirez

Since youth, it was impressed upon me to ask questions on things I do not understand. And if an answer is given me, to not just accept the response as an absolute truth. I was always challenged to dig deeper and to learn how to discern for myself and relay my findings. I can't say if it was unfortunate for me that I didn't have the benefit of having constant contact with kids my age to interact with during my formative years, except maybe in the Catholic school my parents enrolled me in. I was always with adults 20 to 40 years my senior and I found that I could relay my thoughts with ease with my older relatives and teachers than my classmates. I can't remember how, but an aunt found, and she still insists to this day, that I learned to read even before I learned to speak fluently. She says, my favorite books then were bible stories. My five favorite words were what, why, where, when, and how. Words that have an entirely different meaning during my teenage years when I also learned what "party" means, in a time when I realized what I might have been missing. Well, it was not much, but it was and still is, fun.

Growing up in a military family, it was my constant question to my relatives in the service the morality and justification of having to kill, if need be, for love of God and country. But didn't God say: Thou shalt not kill? Around this time, I learned the bible in itself contained records of atrocities that man committed against man in an era long past. Which lead to more questions and a search for more answers.

For some, religion provides a moral compass. For others, it provides spiritual uplifting. Whatever the reason, religion has, in a way, distorted the perception of what it truly means to live for the glory of a God. This has been going on since time past. Religion per se, have been dividing the people for centuries. In this time of crisis, and because of the blind submission to religion by the majority, I wouldn't be surprised if attendance in services increases while collection boxes dwindle.

Am I Catholic? Well, I was baptized to be one. Do I believe in God? Certainly I do. But the belief I have of God now is not the cookie cutter mold set out by men in flowing robes during my youth. They imposed that I needed to follow certain protocols just to be pleasing in the eyes of my God. How can I not be pleasing in His eyes? Him, the one being that is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent made us, didn't He? Well technically by virtue of having human parents, like their parents before them, and so on and so forth.

Where do these religious fanatics get all these? And who hands it down to them? Oh and please, don't give me that "it's all in the bible" diversion. I've lived with that all my life, and I've read several versions of the bible. I have also read the Koran and several others on Taoism, Buddhism, and the like. Have any of you wondered where the bible came from? Yes that consistent bestselling book favored by many Christians. Why are there several versions? And for those not in the know, the bible we know of today is actually composed of several different books. It has been translated and edited several times over time from the originals where they came from. I don't know with you, but there has to be something lost in translation in the existing versions. And while we are on the subject, please, can some "expert theologian" clarify for me the necessity and significance of Vatican II. In addition, because of the present political, social, economic, and technological changes, will there be a need for a Vatican III?

Faith "IN" religion is the biggest malady present in every religious organization these days. We need only to open our eyes. Accept that the supposed "truth" most of us grew up with, is not absolute. Like processed food, religion has been infused with so much additives and preservatives to make it more appealing and palatable. Forgetting the fact that food is there to sustain life but with so much artificial and synthetic substances added, it has been poisoning us figuratively and literally the more we consume. Religion, in my point of view, has lost its purity of form and genuine intent.

Answer me these: All religions preaches love, peace, charity, etc., etc. Now why do we still have wars? Why do we still have hungry people? If one follows all the edicts of their religious affiliation, does that make them better persons? If you say, yes to the last question, how so? Who set the qualifications, why, and what for? Where will all these lead? Puzzling isn't it? And there are still more questions that one must learn to ask. And one must learn to ask the right ones.

In times of war, assuming both leagues of combatants pray to the same God, which side does He choose? Does He really choose a side or does he decide to decimate both sides. Well, assuredly, the latter is the result. But does He choose it to be so? I say not. How arrogant of us to say or even think for God. What of our prayers then? Are we praying to a non-existing entity and pinning our hopes and faith in a God who doesn't care? After all, based on their teachings, we are all His creations and can be disposed of as He pleases. I'm not deeply religious but I say nay both instances.

What any church is forgetting is that we all, have been bestowed the power of FREE WILL. The right to choose for ourselves. That follows for whatever religion, sect, cult and what have you. We have the power to choose whether we want to be in the side of light or dark. I am not deeply religious like I said before, but tell me who would you rather believe? A gift given to you by a Creator or a set of laws made by men whose covert aim is to control your growth as a human being, if, and only if. Think and search within you, the answer is there.

We all have FREE WILL.

If you choose to be with the light, then be good for all its worth and share it. If you chose to be in the dark. Then do so because you also have the right to it. But please, do not involve good people in your affairs regardless of religion; much more never involve the young to wallow in your enterprise. And please no pretensions. It will seep out like a cracked rotten egg no matter how hard one tries to conceal it. Always remember that once caught, you still have to contend with punitive measures and legal edicts set by man. So why make your life complicated?

Guilt and conscience are two effective tools any organized religion uses to make their devotees fall in line. Which makes one with a clear mind think especially in these uncertain times: Are we really following the edicts of God or that of fallible men? In times of war, the one who incited the conflict shoulders the greatest sin. Case in point, from Lucifer the Light Bringer, to Satan Prince of Darkness. No need to cite examples in modern day terms. They are all around us. From the echelons of society to the halls of government, and even in our places of worship.

Truth does hurt especially for some whose belief structure, indoctrinated in them all their lives, has been allayed. It is therefore hard to accept to be faced with the fact that the truth we know is not absolute. All organized religion has flaws. We must learn to accept that. Saying otherwise would be foolish. It doesn't matter what group you belong to and it definitely doesn't make one a better person just to be associated with one. Well, not unless you choose to be a better person than the rest of the flock. And that goes to your credit as an individual, not to the religious organization you belong to.

But why dwell on religion alone? For the most part, life in itself is already complex, and religion only complicates matters even further. The realization of dealing with our mortal birth, life, and eventual death is already quite an imposing venture. Death however does not discriminate. Religions do.

Let me just clarify that I am referring to RELIGION and not FAITH.

Do not be confused with one for the other. My view is that they are entirely different. And saying that one is synonymous with the other would be highly irregular. One can have religion but not faith, and vice versa. All religions, however, claim that we are the vanguards of the earth. Fine, let's do that. Why not heed this and preserve this planet of ours so that future generations can enjoy living here much as we do now? Whatever is left of it from our daily abuse.

Religion has always been a delicate subject in any discussion. But if one looks at it from a different perspective, we need not concern ourselves with what our religious leaders say and the consequences that comes if we do not heed their words. I say, those are their words. Not the words of your God. The God you should have genuine FAITH in. Assuming of course, you dear reader, believe in the existence of a God.

Tim Yap Maybe Charged with Violating RA 9165

2009-01-17T14:53:00.000-08:00

Amiel Aguilar and Atty Trixie Angelese

Dangerous Drugs Board Chairman Vicente Sotto III in an on-air interview via Magic 89.9 FM ( January 15, 2009) has confirmed that the owners of Club Embassy maybe charged with violating Republic Act 9165 (Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002: An Act Instituting the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002, Repealing Republic Act No. 6425, otherwise known as the Dangerous Drugs Act of 1972, as amended, Providing Funds Therefore, and for other Purposes), which he described as "places which can be classified as DIVES" and reiterated that this should serve as a warning to all! He also said that a long watch list of celebrity drug users and media personalities is already in his desk.

Our story on the brouhaha of betrayal, abuse of power and high society drug abuse by the so-called Gucci Gang started at the Hotel Intercontinental when a group of high society columnists had Australian blogger Brian Gorrell arrested and illegally detained for more than eight hours by the MAKATI Police. With the help of MAGDALO lawyer Agree Guevarra, I personally followed up and confirmed the illegal detention with the kind assistance of a staff (Philippine Marine Corp Officer)of Sen. Rudolfo Biazon. The "Gucci Gang" present at the Makati Police station when Gorrell was held for questioning were Delfin DJ Montano, Celine Lopez, Marcel Crespo and Jackie Cohen-Antonio. Later on a certain JM Rodriguez ( an alleged Gucci Gang member) told me; "kaya kayo may threat kasi nakiki-alam kayo (you get threats because you keep on interfering)".

Later, blogger Brian Gorrell alleged through his blog and live interviews in Magic 89.9 FM the rampant drug use by the Gucci Gang in club Embassy. Months after regular interviews with Brian Gorrell, Magic 89.9 account executives received three (3) death threats that apparently came from the camp of Delfin DJ Montano. I immediately called Supreme Editor Timothy Yap regarding the threats but he unfortunately told me; "Wala na akong paki (I don't care!)".

The Victorina Council upholds our position that grave abuse was committed and that justice be served! amiel aguilar cabanlig

Section 6. Maintenance of a Den, Dive or Resort. - The penalty of life imprisonment to death and a fine ranging from Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00) to Ten million pesos (P10,000,000.00) shall be imposed upon any person or group of persons who shall maintain a den, dive or resort where any dangerous drug is used or sold in any form.

The penalty of imprisonment ranging from twelve (12) years and one (1) day to twenty (20) years and a fine ranging from One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00) to Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00) shall be imposed upon any person or group of persons who shall maintain a den, dive, or resort where any controlled precursor and essential chemical is used or sold in any form.

The maximum penalty provided for under this Section shall be imposed in every case where any dangerous drug is administered, delivered or sold to a minor who is allowed to use the same in such a place.
Should any dangerous drug be the proximate cause of the death of a person using the same in such den, dive or resort, the penalty of death and a fine ranging from One million (P1,000,000.00) to Fifteen million pesos (P500,000.00) shall be imposed on the maintainer, owner and/or operator.

If such den, dive or resort is owned by a third person, the same shall be confiscated and escheated in favor of the government: Provided, That the criminal complaint shall specifically allege that such place is intentionally used in the furtherance of the crime: Provided, further, That the prosecution shall prove such intent on the part of the owner to use the property for such purpose: Provided, finally, That the owner shall be included as an accused in the criminal complaint.

The maximum penalty provided for under this Section shall be imposed upon any person who organizes, manages or acts as a "financier" of any of the illegal activities prescribed in this Section.

The penalty twelve (12) years and one (1) day to twenty (20) years of imprisonment and a fine ranging from One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00) to Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00) shall be imposed upon any person, who acts as a "protector/coddler" of any violator of the provisions under this Section.

Section 7. Employees and Visitors of a Den, Dive or Resort. - The penalty of imprisonment ranging from twelve (12) years and one (1) day to twenty (20) years and a fine ranging from One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00) to Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00) shall be imposed upon:
(a) Any employee of a den, dive or resort, who is aware of the nature of the place as such; and
(b) Any person who, not being included in the provisions of the next preceding, paragraph, is aware of the nature of the place as such and shall knowingly visit the same

Section 8. Manufacture of Dangerous Drugs and/or Controlled Precursors and Essential Chemicals. - The penalty of life imprisonment to death and a fine ranging Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00) to Ten million pesos (P10,000,000.00) shall be imposed upon any person, who, unless authorized by law, shall engage in the manufacture of any dangerous drug.

The penalty of imprisonment ranging from twelve (12) years and one (1) day to twenty (20) years and a fine ranging from One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00) to Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00) shall be imposed upon any person, who, unless authorized by law, shall manufacture any controlled precursor and essential chemical.

The presence of any controlled precursor and essential chemical or laboratory equipment in the clandestine laboratory is a prima facie proof of manufacture of any dangerous drug. It shall be considered an aggravating circumstance if the clandestine laboratory is undertaken or established under the following circumstances:

(a) Any phase of the manufacturing process was conducted in the presence or with the help of minor/s:
(b) Any phase or manufacturing process was established or undertaken within one hundred (100) meters of a residential, business, church or school premises;
(c) Any clandestine laboratory was secured or protected with booby traps;
(d) Any clandestine laboratory was concealed with legitimate business operations; or
(e) Any employment of a practitioner, chemical engineer, public official or foreigner.

The maximum penalty provided for under this Section shall be imposed upon any person, who organizes, manages or acts as a "financier" of any of the illegal activities prescribed in this Section.

The penalty of twelve (12) years and one (1) day to twenty (20) years of imprisonment and a fine ranging from One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000.00) to Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00) shall be imposed upon any person, who acts as a "protector/coddler" of any violator of the provisions under this Section.

In a nutshell, TIM YAP should be under investigation, but not only for what the reports have been made out to, which is "selling" or "pushing." Maintenance of a den, dive or resort, and coddling are multiple charges that he can be liable for.

Plus he advertises that he provides "absolute privacy" for VIP rooms, the subtext being, its carte blanche for those who can pay...

atty.trixie angeles

Impunity at the Valley Golf

2008-12-28T22:19:00.000-08:00

IMPUNITY AT THE VALLEY GOLF

Atty. Trixie Cruz-Angeles

This is a story of how a member of the government’s Peace Panel forgot his duty and allowed violence to happen in front of him.

On 22 December 2006, Gloria Arroyo appointed Sec. Nasser C. Pangadaman of the Department of Agrarian Reform to the Peace Panel.

On 26 December 2008, Sec. Pangandaman allegedly stood by while his son and namesake, Masiu City, Lanao del Sur Mayor Nasser Pangandaman Jr. and five bodyguards mauled Delfin de la Paz, 56 and his son Bino, 14. The attack first happened on the golf course of the Valley Golf and Country Club in Antipolo when the Pangandaman party overtook the de la Paz party on the course.

From the Gmanews.tv: The elder de la Paz said the Pangandaman father and son overtook them at one of the holes, prompting him to ask a marshal to have them get back in line, but when they were playing at the fifth hole, Pangandaman Jr allegedly voiced impatience with his slow playing.

Irked at the blatant breach of golf etiquette (parties or “flights” as they are called, should not overtake another flight without permission from the preceding one), Delfin de la Paz went up to speak to the Pangandaman party. Heated words ensued and Pangandaman, Jr. threw a punch at Delfin de la Paz. Bodyguards immediately followed and repeatedly punched de la Paz. Bino del la Paz rushed to assist his father but was in turn punched repeatedly and personally by Pangandaman Jr. It bears repeating that Bino de la Paz is fourteen years old.

Bambee de la Paz, daughter of Delfin and part of his flight, tried to help her father and brother but was prevented from doing so by other bodyguards. She says “So we complained to the marshal. We played the 5th hole and walked towards the next hole, where there is a tee house, and both the flights in front of us were there, talking with the marshal. The mayor of Masiu City, Lanao del Sur talked with my dad. Things got heated up. Voices were raised. But never, in my wildest dreams, did I ever imagine that someone would pull out a punch. Apparently not. He attacked my father. His flightmates, maybe 2 or 3 of them, rushed to his aid and beat up my father. My 56-year-old father. My younger brother and I could not just watch. We rushed to break the fight. My younger brother pleaded to the mayor to please stop it. To not hurt my dad. To just stop. His words still ring through my head..."Sorry na po, sorry na po...tama na...tama na po..." With his hands in front of his chest in a praying position. PLEADING. The mayor sacked him in the face. My brother defended himself. My dad was still on the ground getting clobbered. My brother, the same way. I tred to stop the fight, but all I could do was stop one person. There were 4 or 5 of them attacking now.

Someone broke up the fight. I thought it was all over. The mayor shouted to his caddy: "Hindi nila kami kilala! Sabihin mo nga sa kanila kung sino ako!" And believe me, I had no idea who this person was. But now I know. He's the person who, with 4 other men, beat up my 56-year-old father and my 14-year-old brother. He's the person who sacked a pleading 14-year-old kid in the face. He's a person who, I am sure, is gonna rot in hell.

I lashed out, but my dad held me back. I was screaming my lungs out, shouting to this mayor, telling him about what he had done. I said: "Nakakahiya kayo. Singkwenta'y sais anyos ang tatay ko. And kapatid ko kakatorse anyos. Anong ilalaban nila sayo?"

The mayor looked at my brother, poinedt to his face, and says, "Tatandaan kita!" And he told me that my brother has a bad attitude and that I need to watch him. WHAT THE HELL?! So, my brother's bad for defending his father?!” (http://vicissitude-decidido.blogspot.com/)

After the scuffle, the three went to the clubhouse to report the incident where they again ran into the Pangandaman party.

Bambee says, “We leave. We walk to the clubhouse to file a complaint. My brother asks for a doctor. My dad could barely walk. Their group comes to the clubhouse, sees my brother. Once again my brother pleads, says sorry, and is crying. He was CRYING, for crissakes. But no. The relentless mayor still punches him in the face, and then sees my dad and goes after my dad again. Him and his friend pull my dad to the ground, pulls at his feet, and steps on him like he's dirt. I run to him and try to hold him back, holding him back by his shirt, while this other guy and this girl tries to stop me. She tells me to just stop it. I scream in her face "they're beating my father up and you want me to stop?!" I pull at his shirt--I don't let go. All I can see was my dad being trampled on. I didn't even see my brother getting beat up.

People pull them away. I get my dad, and I saw my brother. His right ear was bleeding. I freaked out. I told the receptionists to bring my brother to the clinic. I pull my dad away. People were separating us.

My mom and my older brother come. I tell her Bino's right ear is bleeding. They both look like they could kill. My dad holds my brother off, I hold off my mom. When I finally got my mom under control, my older brother gets away and I hold him off. Two of the mayor's bodyguards pull out guns. I embraced my brother from the back, just holding him back, crying. The receptionists came to us, crying, hugging me, my dad, and my mom, whispering to us to just leave. "Maam, umalis na po kayo, may mga baril sila...Maam...umalis na po kayo please..."

Aside from the obvious charges of physical injuries filed against Pangadaman, the de la Pazes charge the attackers with violation of Republic Act 7610 the Anti-Child Abuse Act, for the injuries deliberately inflicted on 14-year-old Bino. Mayor Mangandaman, Jr. meanwhile counter charges Delfin de la Paz with slight physical injuries alleging that de la Paz attacked him with an umbrella.

The outrage on this is building and already the coffee shop pundits are wondering if GMA will fire her DAR Secretary and consequently remove him from the peace panel. I’m also wondering if the general public will see the connection between the illegitimacy of Gloria Arroyo and the blatant abuse of power displayed by these public officials.

In the past eight years, the Arroyos have managed to subvert all manner of processes to keep themselves free from litigation. Does anyone remember the kidnapping orchestrated by Mike Defensor on Ping Lacson’s witness on FG’s improprieties? The impeachment processes that were reduced to the inappropriately termed “numbers games”? ZTE? Yet, amazingly, when Mike Arroyo filed his own cases, his cases seemed to speed right along.

People know that these things happen in the halls of power. But never has it been so blatant, so in-your-face. And never have we, as a people been so cowed and so accepting of this kind of insidious status quo. A member of the government peace panel cannot keep the public peace and stands by as his son beats up a father and son. It seems to be just another injustice in the land of the apathetic.

Victorina Will Continue To Fight

2008-12-07T09:07:00.000-08:00

by: Atty.Trixie Angeles

The Constitution says that no law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, and of the press. This provision assures us that free speech is the rule, and it is protected. Government is therefore prevented from prescribing laws such as censorship that prohibit expression prior to publication or punishment after publication. But not all speech is protected.

Libel, sedition and obscenity are some of the known exceptions. Libel is defined under Article 335 of the Revised Penal Code as a public and malicious imputation of a crime, vice or defect, real or imaginary or any act omission, condition, status or circumstance tending to discredit or cause the dishonour or contempt of a natural or juridical person or to blacken the memory of one who is dead,

The elements of libel are:

a. imputation of a discreditable act or condition to another
b. publication of the imputation
c. identity of the person defamed and
d. existence of malice

For conviction, all elements must be present and proven. Standards are lower for public figures which include but are not limited to actors, "celebrities," and politicians. Defamatory statements or imputations are presumed to be malicious –even if true – if no good intention or justifiable motive for making it is shown.

A columnist inferring that a government official has dipped his hand into the public coffers may defend himself by showing that such a statement was made in accordance with the public interest of transparency. If, however, there is no justifiable reason to have made the malicious imputation, even if such an imputation is true, it shall be considered libellous. In such a case, truth is not a defense. Quite recently, (January 2008) the Supreme Court recommended to the lower courts the imposition of fines and the payment of damages, rather than imprisonment of those convicted of libel. It also recommended to Congress the decriminalization of libel.

Congress, on the other hand, came up with the Right to Reply bill, requiring media to provide equal and commensurate space for the subjects of a news item or column, to present their sides. It has not passed plenary, though. In consonance with the Supreme Court recommendations, criminal libel should be a thing of the past. However, since there are instances where a person could be wrongfully maligned, its civil liability will remain. We must note that the internet appears to be the last bastion of absolute free speech. Yes, currently the local courts appear to be less inclined to explore its parameters. This is perhaps due to the difficulty of establishing jurisdictions, or maybe due to the lack of ‘cyber-knowledge’ among some of our magistrates. Yet for most of us, online blogging categorically makes for a far more interesting reading than traditional media.

The phenomenon of blogging has removed the censorship power from those seeking commercial political and religious advantages that makes mainstream media pander to their interests. It has allowed the democratization of free speech by taking away the filters of opinion that publishers have by virtue of ownership. The internet has allowed us to say things we cannot say or are afraid to say in print, television or even in movies.

Brian Gorrell, for instance, would not have found an audience for his story had he gone to the papers first, nor would Malu Fernandez have been given the internet version of an extreme reality check. These have the effects of providing an alternative to mainstream media and directly empowering the ordinary person. It is all well and good. Yet the law addresses the bad stuff –malicious imputations and the like -- because clearly, there is a need to do so. We acknowledge that democratic space is necessary and so is the need to protect individual rights, such as the right to be protected from libel.

Because of the empowering effect of the internet, a single person can destroy the reputation of one otherwise outstanding citizen. That person need not be telling the truth. But a blogger can continually blog untruths until, as Goebbels said, the lies are repeated often enough and become appreciated as the truth. Anyone who has been the object of unfair gossip knows what this feels like and for the most part, sometimes time doesn't heal.

Our discussion therefore must seek a balance between the right to free speech and the right to be protected from libel.

Do we do this by applying a less stringent form of the libel law to the internet or should we leave such balance to be achieved naturally by the force of public opinion?

The Backstory of the Fertilizer Scam

2008-11-15T06:44:00.000-08:00

Bolante was grilled for more than seven hours but the Senators miserably failed to shake him down into admitting any irregularity - Bolante was cool even when irate senators shouted at him and called him names.

Senators did such a terrible job on the Jocjoc investigation prompting Victorina to make its own analysis on the matter.

Senate President Manuel Villar Jr., was not amazed that Bolante washed his hands off the scam. “His denial was not surprising. What would have been surprising was if he suddenly pointed fingers,” Villar said. Roxas and Lacson on the other hand said that they would show the “lies and inconsistencies” of Bolante in future hearings.

San Juan City Mayor Joseph Victor Ejercito also called Bolante “con artist” who has been “acting” since his arrival from the United States on October 28. Estrada added, “Joc-Joc behaved like a member of a criminal syndicate wherein he protected his master at all cost.”

Well guys, there goes our TAXES - To a bunch of media-hungry filibusters who cannot even argue appropriately.

RainB

PCIJ reported that roughly 3 billion pesos were released from the funds of the Department of Agricultural during the presidential campaign of 2004, including the lesser known Swine Scandal and the more popular Fertilizer Scam. This was a combination of tax payers money, the Marcos Funds worth 1 Billion Pesos (transferred from DAR to DA in April 2004) and some other sources. This does not included the Overseas Workers Welfare Fund used to finance the health cards for the poor.

We will pay attention to the scam du jour: the Fertilizer Scam or more specifically the funds meant to provide farm inputs to poor farmers as part of the plan to increase agricultural productivity. It seems the trail was something like this:

Well, we all know the rest from the reports of PCIJ and other media outlets. Farmers did not receive any input, there were too many irregularities. The foregone conclusion was that the amount was used to bolster GMA weak campaign against FPJ. The Senate blamed the Presidency; graft cases were filed at the Ombudsman.

Now, it seems Joc-joc’s testimony in the Senate inquiry reveals a simple game plan! Actual recipients, who honestly accepted the fertilizer and distributed it, are now validating and attesting that they received the fertilizer from JOCJOC BOLANTE in 2004. These testimonies will give credence to JOCJOC BOLANTE's claim that funds for fertilizer were actually distributed to various government officials. JOCJOC BOLANTE and other official in the administration, specially GMA, were never involved in the anomaly. They simply implemented the fertilizer support program for farmers. The scam and anomaly were committed by the government officials who were the conduits of the fertilizer funds!

Abs-Cbn forum opined that with this game plan, JOCJOC BOLANTE, CITO LORENZO and other DA officials, GMA, and leaders of LAKAS party, will be free from blame. Each recipient was accountable for the funds he or she received. Such a game plan cannot be crafted by a sick man bedridden in St. Lukes Hospital.

But who is the main man in this whole choreography, the one who remains silent. Where is Cito Lorenzo? Or who is Cito Lorenzo.

Before Cito became GMA’s favorite, he was Ateneo President Ben Nebres’ golden boy. Before that, he was CEO of Del Monte Philippines when the Lorenzo’s sold out their banana plantation and bought the controlling shares of this agricultural company.

This acquisition started with the macho pride of his brother Marco, who worked as a farm supervisor when Del Monte was still a subsidiary of RJR Nabisco. Because he was an Ateneo boy, he was out of place in the ranch and plantation. He earned the wrath and jealousy of a higher supervisor named Faez Saab, who was the golden boy of another Jesuit, the late Fr. William Masterson. Faez saw to it that Marco was pushed away from Del Monte. Finally Marco succumbed to the pressure and resigned. But he overheard Faez telling the other guys “I will have my dick circumcised again if that Marco returns here in Del Monte.” Bad move. The next year, the Lorenzo’s bought the whole company upon the insistence of Marco. Well, guess who was kicked out.

Luisito took over the CEO function while Marco managed the plantation. At that time, Ateneo wanted to firm up its athletic program because the Blue Eagle failed to bring home the UAAP crown for a long time. Ateneo needed a new center for its new sport program. Thus the Moro Lorenzo Sports Center was built, largely by the donation of Cito’s family with the help of some alumni. And the special friendship between Fr. Nebres, Cito Lorenzo and GMA grew stronger.

Ateneo de Manila produced only one president – a dropout Erap. It was time to groom a potential true-blue Atenista who can redeem them from the disgrace of EDSA 2. The Alumni found in Cito the potential: handsome, eloquent, competent, dedicated and hardworking, with a vision for the poor, at least at the start. His grooming started with a small cabinet office without portfolio yet very high profile: Presidential Adviser on Food Security & Job Creation. He was tasked to create ONE MILLION JOBS for the employment program of GMA. It was a program hatched in the Marcoeconomics Research Center of Ateneo, where GMA taught. Cito implemented the plan by mobilizing the business and agricultural sector and was able to produce the output.

His star was rising. Next, building up on his Del Monte experience, GMA asked him to take over Department of Agriculture. Cito constructed an ultra-modern agricultural project for the country, something that required intense capitalization from the government. In his mind, he wanted the Philippines to be independent from other countries in terms of food production. It was a good plan, but some people had other things in mind. Around this time, Fernando Poe Jr posed himself as the champion of the masses. GMA men needed money because she did not have FPJ’s charm. They needed a sacrificial lamb - our golden boy who dreamed to become the next president.

That was the end of his career.

Let's Talk Jocjoc

2008-10-30T06:45:00.000-07:00

Former U.P. President (when I was still a student at the State University) and founder of the country's top law firm ACCRA, Sen. Eduardo Angara said that the a revival of the Senate query on the alleged anomaly surrounding the Department of Agriculture fertilizer fund in 2004 might set a bad precedent. He further said that “that is not the rule of law”. (rare photo: Jocjoc Bolante by the Manila Times)

Please remember that former Senator Ramon “Jun” Magsaysay Jr., has thoroughly investigated the controversy in 2006. Because the Senate has submitted its final report, Angara said it is only the Office of the Ombudsman that can now pursue the investigation. The Office of the Ombudsman should file PLUNDER CHARGES against Bolante for diverting the fertilizer fund to several companies instead of giving them to farmer beneficiaries.

OK, before Andros and my readers get all heated up, let me make it clear that our Presidential election is in close proximity and I would presume that “vociferous” Senators are merely posturing for votes. So we see Mar Roxas getting all excited with the Euro-Generals when it is already established (in my point of view) that they are culpable. The Senate is an unfair forum because the person in question is not allowed to have a lawyer- Plus the fact the Senate has become MEDIA'S "haven for intrigues".

Hey, what the Euro-General’s did was an illicit CASH CONVERSION ( I will not go into the modus operandi because it is an unlawful practice. But I assure you, I’ve been there and seen that.). It is no secret dearies, so if the Senators were genuine, they should have legislated measures to end this malpractice a long time ago. So what’s up with Miriam’s discourteous rhetorics against a cabinet secretary may ask! Well, her revulsion for the Puno’s is another story in this blog.

Angara also said the The Senate President has “no intrinsic power” to issue the order. He said it is only upon the recommendation of the committee that a warrant of arrest may be enforced. If the Senate detains Bolante, Angara said there must be a case filed against him. Otherwise, it’s illegal detention. I tend to agree with Angara because I feel the POLITICAL POSTURING- Remember dearies that the top 3 Presidential candidates have guested in the Good Times show and I have yet to see a sincere candidate!

I would suppose that Angara is suspicious of Senators who simply need the EXTRA PUBLICITY to be President!

Lastly is my personal issue on the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH interfering with our political affairs. I already had so much antagonism towards Jocjoc - but the Archbishops meddling with our politics turned me off. No offense RainB but I am presently evaluating Father Romeo Intengan's essay endorsed by the National Security Adviser entitled "AFP: Defefender of the Nation, Guardian of Democracy, and Servant of the People" ( Center for Strategic Studies, Ateneo de Manila).

Frankly, the priests essay on National Defense gives me the creeps!

Vanity- My Favorite Sin!

2008-10-24T06:46:00.000-07:00

Correct me if I'm wrong but there is an ancient saying that those whom the gods would destroy they first make all powerful and proud. I hope RainB doesn't accuse me of using metaphors since I'm running out of words (and Andros please support me on this). Once in my life “the gods" took from me what I haughtily thought was duly mine . This place I am is where I started and it is impossible to start from anywhere else- I have no intentions of becoming greater than the hand that feeds me.

Let me narrate to you a story of a self-styled public figure and self-proclaimed crusader Atty Jun Francisco. For my readers pleasure I will mention the prominent Firms' that he worked for -ACRRA… The name alone commands respect, right dearies?

Yes, going through his case with ACRRA, I must admit that the then young lawyers intention looked pretty noble. It took me almost a week to scrutinize the cause of Jun's break-up with "The Firm". Well, I will rely on the "Good Book" to put down moral judgment; "Do not let loyalty and faithfulness forsake you; bind them around your neck, write them on the tablet of your heart."

Our crusader, Atty. Jun Francisco, filed a petition for a TRO against the collection of additional tolls in our public transport system. He did this devoid of his bosses' blessing and even against their wishes, according to my sources. The act may be commendable but to me loyalty outweigh everything else. According to my sources, he claims that this was his first taste of lawyering for the good and benefit of the "public". At any rate, he filed his petition without clearing it with his bosses at ACCRA. Indeed, the young lawyer was able to obtain the TRO- He is sharp and a go-getter.

When the hullabaloo reached his bosses in ACCRA and tittle-tattle about the episode spread around his office like wildfire, the young lawyer was finally called in. According to my sources, when he came to office that day, he was roundly applauded by his co-workers at "The Firm". He thought he had done them great service! But the round of applause wasn't really to praise him. My sources say, everyone was in fact sardonically mocking their young lawyer colleague. He was called straight into his boss' office and was "FIRED", according to my sources.

To this day, he "asserts" that the prestigious law firm was wrong in "firing" him.

Sources tell me that he filed a petition that was totally in conflict with one of the "The Firm's" client- There you go guys, another conflict of interest… The young lawyer perfectly knew this contradiction, yet he still persistently filed the petition. He succeeded in having his first dose of a "media frenzy". But as always, such early adulations especially from media can inflate the ego. Well, the trial that he defiantly undertook without "The Firms" consent cost him his job but he comforted himself with the thought that finally, he got the media attention he so believed he deserved – even at the expense of the law firm he works for.

Yet his "bosses" were kind enough not to run after his license. Nietzsche sums it all up in a famous saying- One who is inconspicuous in dealing with colleagues display his HUBRIS all the more strongly in dealing with things like the city, state and society.

Now it seems to me that vengeance has been consuming him.

Gorrells lawyer sued by Crusader or Ambulance C

2008-10-21T06:48:00.000-07:00

Last Wednesday, lawyer Ernesto Francisco, one of the private prosecutors who represented the families of Teehankee's victims asked the Supreme Court to nullify the Board of Pardons and Parole's recommendation for sentence commutation and the subsequent grant of executive clemency to Teehankee.

The release of Claudio Teehankee, Jr. caused waves recently. The Hultmans claim they were never informed of the pending release. And yet there appears to be a document they signed signifying their apparent notice. The document was coursed through their lawyer- One Ernesto “Jun” Fransisco, Jr! This same attorney, is filing a case to cause the return of Teehankee to the prison system. And yet the release appears to be the result of his own doing. How could the Hultmans not have been informed of the release?

Perhaps the answer lies with their legal counsel.

Jun Fransisco appears to be handling other equally controversial cases, and sells himself as a “crusading lawyer.” Is he?

Just today, the Ateneo Lawyer Jun Francisco sued Brian Gorrells lawyer /activist Atty. Trixie Angeles and UP /activist Atty. Argee Guevarra. The case actually is harassment and holds no legal basis. Nevertheless, it was filed without the usual attempts to determine true liability or fault- A requirement in the judicial system, to prevent unnecessary and harassment suits.

I wholeheartedly support the “MAROON” lawyers!

Jun appeared as Magdalo lawyer quite recently, after the November 29 incident at the Manila Penn. He volunteered his services to Sen. Trillanes, et al, who were charged with rebellion. Some civilian co-accused, who needed lawyers too, approached him for representation. He told the civilians, “I’m sorry. I only represent people with NAMES.” At the time, he succeeded in convincing former Vice-President Teofisto Guingona and Sen. Trillanes and his group, to take his services for free and easing out their original lawyer. The irate civilians had no other recourse but to obtain their own paid counsels. But not after Jun Fransisco left a very bad taste in their mouth.

When the impeachment case against Desierto was filed some years ago, jaded political observers, suspicious journalists and other non-believers first looked the man over, from head to toe, front to back. Alas, he is neither an Erap fanatic nor a Gloria enthusiast. He is obviously, PRO-HIMSELF!

According to an interview given by Jun he started BRIBING judges around 1994 as an associate in the prestigious ACCRA Law Office. He admits as much when he filed the impeachment case against Aniano Desierto in 2001 saying that he himself brought the BRIBE money to Desierto. Jun said he gave Desierto through a Fernando "Ding" Timbol, reportedly Desierto's PR man, video equipment worth P273,000 aside from CASH given directly to the ombudsman. (photo: Atty. Trixie Angeles)

IS THIS MAN A CRUSADER OR AN AMBULANCE CHASER?

Republic of Boracay

2008-10-19T06:49:00.000-07:00

The beautiful island of BORACAY is renowned for many things- cerullean clear waters, more than a mile long beachfront of beautiful powder white sand and friendly people. This makes the island an ideal tourist destination. Some say it could very well be one of the BEST beaches in the world. The beautiful island belongs to the Republic of the Philippines and the Filipino people. We should benefit from this picturesque island paradise hassle free because we own the island.

Lately, I feel that the island is becoming a break-away Republic, governed by a miscellany of ignobleness.

Upon arrival to the beautiful island, all citizens of the Republic and it’s tourists are obligated to pay an environmental fee! I absolutely consent to the scheme as long as the money is audited and checked by the citizenry to make sure that the amounts go to the islands rehabilitation.

I once went snorkling with a cluster of journalists to explore the islands flora and fauna. Before I can even catch a gulp of air and take another plunge, a boatman came up to me and charged me a “snorkling fee”. What the hell! “How can I carry money underwater,” I told the boatman. He told me; “Sorry it’s the mayors orders!” The mayors office also charges up to 150 thousand pesos for any type of event in the PUBLIC beach front. Oh yes dearies, our company paid twice the exorbitant fee. But where does the money go?

A ravenous contruction frenzy has also been going on in the island free of checks and balance.

Tourism Secretary Joseph Ace Durano backed the plans by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources to sue Malay Mayor Ciceron Cawaling for failing to stop the construction frenzy on the island. "With the failure of Mayor Cawaling to stop construction...I have no recourse but to file the necessary charges," Lito Atienza said. Among the construction activities on the island are those by Ambassador Hotel in Paradise Resort, Crown Regency Hotel, Bocaray Regency Lagoon, BTR Hotel, KCI Ariham, Crown Regency Prince Hotel, Teodora Biggiogero KCI, Erus Suite Hotel, and Salic B. Ibrahim Hotel.

What really BROKE MY HEART was when I went to the islands small botanical zoo using an ATV (all terrain vehicle). If there is one thing that I am most proud of in the Philippines is it’s mighty Philippine Eagle (pithecophaga jefferyi). Some scientists argue that the “haring ibon” (king of the birds) is only second largest; but recent studies show that it is indeed the biggest and the definitely fiercest bird in the WORLD (“The term largest can have different meanings. The Harpy Eagle maybe the largest in terms of bulk or weight, but the Philippine Eagle is the largest in terms of wingspan and height.” Dr. Kennedy)

The great Philippine Eagle is a faithful mate and prefers a monogamous existence. It usually builds its nest on towering tropical trees about 80 feet above the ground (sufficient enough for it to have a good view over its territory). When it was discovered in 1896, the natives call the bird “Monkey-Eating Eagle” because it preyed on monkeys that abound then in Philippine forest particularly in the islands Mindanao and Luzon. Its very small population can be traced to the fact that they live a monogamous life and only lays one egg at a time.

Charles Lindbergh, best known for crossing the Atlantic in 1927, was mesmerized by this great bird. As a representative of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) he travelled to the Philippines several times between 1969 and 1972, where he helped persuade the government to safeguard the “Bird of Prey” in every way possible.

There are only about 100 - 300 of these majestic Philippine Eagles left in the wild. Unfortunately, I saw three (3) of them in a very small cage in the island of Boracay (photo- the rare Haring Ibon in Bora captured by my cel-camera).

WHY?
WE the Filipinos own Boracay!

Teehankee Settlement - The Last Episode

2008-10-12T06:50:00.000-07:00

Claudio "Bobbins" Teehankee was at the peak of his life when he was arrested, and was later convicted of murder. There were no protests from Bobbins' family and friends even though it was the fastest murder trial in Philippine history. In my own words- Off with their Heads!

Even the then President of the Philippines, Cory Aquino, visited the victim while the trial was on-going... The trial was sensationalized and became an instant media frenzy- All because of the his name TEEHANKEE.

On Nov 19 a settlement was signed by ANDERS HULTMAN and the TEEHANKEE family( see document below). The Hultman's expressed in this Settlement that they- recognize that Claudio has shown genuine remorse and has been serving time in good behavior. The Hultmans WILL NOT OBJECT NOR INTERPOSE ANY OBJECTION to the application of such parole....

But just a couple of days ago, we see the Hultmans (via ABS-CBN and GMA) appearing on television objecting to what they have just authorized. For me this is a matter of honor. Let's forget about the crime for a minute. When the Hultmans went out on television, the Teehankee family got flack from the public. The crime of Bobbins is not the crime of his family members- And it's clear that some people are out to destroy their family honor.

The HULTMANS agreed through their lawyers that they will NOT OBJECT nor interpose any objection to the application of PAROLE or the shortening of the sentence of Claudio Teenkee Jr. and such documents are honored in any civilized country- especially after receiving monetary compensation.

The Law is the Law!

Bobbins was surrendered to then Mayor Alfredo Lim by his ANGRY brother Raul. There were no special considerations given to the man even by his own family. He was arrested and incarcerated immediately with NO QUESTIONS ASKED!

Under article 70 of the Revised Penal Code, the maximum sentence cannot exceed 40 years. Bobbins started continuously serving time since July 24,1991.

He is only one of the 1,430 inmates granted executive clemency over the last three years. But it seems he is the only person visible to us mortals.

May I ask why?

The Court approved a Settlement Agreement on Jan 10,2000 based on a joint family motion- basically the Teehankee's and the Hultman's.

TRUTH must always PREVAIL

2008-10-11T06:51:00.000-07:00

After TV bombarded us with the heartrending Maureen Hultman murder, viewers are now hopping mad. Indeed the murder was gruesome and any mother would feel rage if such happened to their child. I pray for sobriety dear readers as I present facts I've researched on.
Though it burdens me to write about the truth, I feel that we should set the record straight. While we remain vigilant in preventing criminality, as a civilized society, we are encouraged to hate the crime but not the criminal.

Above all, TRUTH should always be our guiding light in pursuit of JUSTICE!

The Hultmans REQUIEM of being “not-informed” about the pardon of Teehankee is heard as "deafening wails" to our beleaguered Justice system. The Philippine Daily Inquirer published that- “The Hultmans, who have since relocated to Sweden, protested the seeming haste and SECRECY of the Presidential Pardon. They said that they were not informed beforehand of Teehankee’s release in violation of established procedures.”

But records show that as early as February 6, 2004, the Board of Pardons and Parole has released the “Notice to the Public”. Posted is a copy of the notice given to me (as a journalist) more than three years ago( this was also published in broadsheets)...

The trial to date has been recorded as one of the fastest criminal trials in Philippine history, and the most sensational with the then President Corazon C. Aquino visiting the (dying) victim, Maureen Hultman in the hospital and the then Senator (future President) Joseph E. Estrada appearing in court during the trial in support of the prosecution. Bobbins Teehankee was incarcerated immediately!

5 IMPORTANT events occurred in conjunction with the Hultman Family from 1999 to 2003 before CLAUDIO TEEHANKEE JR, with the help of his family and lawyers, filed his petition for executive clemency in December of 2003.

# On November 19, 1999 a settlement was signed by Anders Hultman, on his and on Vivian Hultman’s behalf, and on behalf of Claudio Jr., his wife and children, and the Teehankee Family, all with the assistance of their lawyers. In this settlement, Bobbins as well as the Teehankee Family expressed their deepest regret and sympathy to the HULTMANS and CHAPMANS. In turn, the Hultman Family expressed that they --recognize[d] that Claudio Teehankee Jr. has shown and exhibited genuine remorse and has been serving his time in good behavior. The HULTMANS through their duly authorized representative herein, will not object nor interpose any objection to the application for such parole or the commutation of shortening of the sentence of Claudio Teehankee, Jr. or to such other similar proceedings or relief provided that the same shall be in accordance of law.

# The Court approved the Settlement Agreement on January 10, 2000 based on a joint motion by the lawyers of both sides.

# The Court then issued a statement of finality on February 17, 2000, making the order approving the settlement and the cancellation of all attachments and garnishments on Claudio Jr.’s properties final.

# During the year 2000 and 2001, the financial components of the settlement were complied with by the Teehankee Family with the family home of Bobbins, with the consent of his wife and children, disposed of in favor of the Hultmans and the MONIES transferred pursuant to the Settlement Agreement,

# On January 13, 2003, the Hultmans (both Anders and Vivian signing) filed a legal document in the Court called a Notice of Satisfaction of Judgment, wherein they say that: Private Complainants Spouses Anders and Vivian Hultman assisted by counsel respectfully manifest that the judgment relative the civil aspect of this case has been settled to their full and complete satisfaction pursuant to the terms of the Settlement of the Civil Aspect executed by the parties on 12 November 1999 and approved by this Honorable Court in its order dated January 10, 2000.

# ONLY THEN AND ONLY AFTER ALL THESE EVENTS AND INTERACTIONS WITH THE HULTMANS did Bobbins through his lawyers file a formal petition for clemency. This was filed on December 22, 2003, the same year that the Hultmans had filed their Notice of Satisfaction pursuant to the terms of the Settlement approved by the Court.

The basis for the application for commutation were the Guidelines of the Board of Pardons and Parole that allowed an inmate to apply for commutation or executive clemency provided that he had served at least 12 years of his sentence, in cases where multiple penalties were meted out and Article 70 of the Revised Penal Code applied such that “the maximum period shall in no case exceed forty (40) years.”

The formal petition recited these preceding events including the no objection agreement and acknowledgment of remorse by the Hultmans on the part of Bobbins.

Pursuant to the Procedures of the Board of Pardons and Parole, on January 28, 2004 and February 6, 2004, notices to the offended parties and prosecutor and presiding judge were issued by the Board, and a PUBLIC NOTICE TO THE WHOLE WORLD was published in the Philippine Star naming 16 inmates (including Bobbins) whose cases were being considered for clemency.

On September 30, 2008, an Order of Commutation was issued by the President culminating the process of the petition Bobbins had filed in 2003, and which order was received by the Bureau of Corrections. The Order shortened the maximum sentence of 40 years (as adjusted under Article 70) to 21 years and 3 months. The clemency for Bobbins was only one of 1,430 orders of executive clemency granted by the President .

Unfortunately, only Bobbins carried the POPULAR family name.

On October 3, 2008, based on actual time served with Good Conduct Allowance credits already standing at 21 years, 3 months and 5 days, Bobbins had legally served his commuted sentence plus more. He called for assistance from family members to pick him up Friday and to help move his things over the weekend. They finished packing late at night.

THIS WAS NO SECRET!

The Chief Executives power is absolute when forgiving. Her Excellency forgave Bobbins- but who do we blame?

Emotions set aside and in the words of ANDROS (I'm a big fan of the guy)---

NOW everything is MOOT and ACADEMIC.

"Empire" under Inspection

2008-10-06T06:52:00.000-07:00

I passed by the Fort Strip last Wednesday night, and was surprised to see PDEA personnel and K-9 drug-sniffing entering the Embassy Super Club. I had the chance to interview some of the operatives. Apparently, when I asked one of the agents he said they were merely inspecting the establishment. The agent also added that their K-9 units are very capable of “sniffing” drugs no matter how concealed.

The agents are serious about the "rising "drug problem in the Makati Bar scene.

In a separate interview PDEA Director Dionisio Santiago said that Ecstacy remains the top selling narcotic in such bars, where they are usually sold at P1,200 each. According to the director; "Madali kasi ang bentahan d’yan... wala kaming sino sino kahit matataas na tao," he said. ( The drug is easilly sold and no one is above the law no matter how high they think they are.)

Anti-narcotics agents and their K-9 units checked every corner of the Embassy bar. Drug-sniffing dogs were also placed at the club entrance. A special agent who I knew, also showed me new types of ecstacy available in the market. The “PDEA” according to him, is “dead serious” about the rising drug problem in BARS.

The Embassy gained “notoriety” after a series of squabbles and scandals involving socialites and well-known personalities took place within the bar's premises. Print and television have also been monitoring the bars activities. Ever since the "Gucci Gang" fiasco exploded, "people have become more aware" according to one of the club's regulars. Several blogs have also accused the bar of being a “drug den” for the high society youth.

"This is just the first club [we’re going to inspect]... we hope other clubs also cooperate,” said PDEA information officer Derrick Carrion.

So here I go again with my humdrum metaphors;

Modern negative consequences of actions stemming from HUBRIS appear to be associated with a lack of knowledge, interest in, and exploration of history, combined with overconfidence and a LACK OF HUMILITY.

Hope You Learn!

The Simple Truth about PURE EVIL

2008-10-04T06:52:00.000-07:00

I despise the hypocrites whose claim to fame is their family’s “possessions”. While material possessions may add bonus points to one's resume of so-called accomplishments, integrity still scores the highest in my book. My mom always said that “honesty is the rarest wealth anyone can possess.”

Well dearies, let me tell you an uncanny encounter I had with a nauseating individual a few years back:

Mojo introduced me to a supposedly “rich” classmate of his, Tim Garcia, from UA&P. The flamboyant kid is the son of General Carlos Garcia. I already heard of his father's exploits long before and so I wanted to be a bit rude to the kid.

“So you’re the son of the AFP’s money-bag (the comptroller). You must be very lucky and proud of yourself,” I told the kid acerbically.

Remarkably, he wasn’t able to grasp my glaringly sardonic remark and we parted ways. The kid didn’t show a tinge of remorse or anger. I thought that was the last time I would ever hear from the kid again.

I was mistaken!

A few months after, the Court of Appeals froze the Garcia family’s assets.

The controversy surrounding the Garcia family stemmed from a letter dated September 14, 2004 from David Meisner about the cash seized from the general’s son (Tim's brother). Matthew Van Dyke, a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent, appeared before the Sandiganbayan on November 12. He was the one who arrested the brother of Tim, Juan Paulo Garcia, for bringing in to the US $100,000 without declaration.

The Philippine government asked the US to extradite the general’s wife, Clarita Garcia, and their children Ian Carl, Juan Paulo and Timothy. The general’s family is allegedly hiding in the US after they were charged with PLUNDER- a capital offense.

The testimony of Van Dyke covered the following: the US government seizure of $100,000 from Juan Paulo in San Francisco in November 2003; Mrs. Garcia’s written explanation on huge amount of dollars confiscated from their son; and letter from General Garcia dated January 12, 2004, about the Fines, Penalties and Forfeiture Office in San Francisco. Records also showed that the general’s wife has sent more than $500,000 to the US from the Philippines since 1993, and that she owns several pieces of property in America.

Forfeiture proceedings in the Philippines were initiated over the Garcias' other assets that were ill-gotten, worth more than P56 million. December 2, 2005 was when the general court martial convicted Garcia of undeclared wealth, dishonorably dismissed him from the military and sentenced him to two years of hard labor.

While this corrupt general and his family accomplices pilfered and plundered from the military coffers - money which could have gone to soldiers fighting for our nation and dying in the fields!

In the very same month and year as the aforementioned story, December 2005, one of my family’s former security detail, Sgt Arnold Calixtro, died of malaria in the fields of Basilan.

I was devastated because I grew up with the Marine Sargent. When I queried why he died, the AFP told me that there was no proper medical attention given because of “lack of funds”.

If I had it my way, death by musketry to PLUNDERERS!

Another metaphor for you readers-

“Dishonesty is so grasping it would deceive God himself, were it possible” (g. bancroft)